Dog Breed: Thai Ridgeback

Ridgeback dog breeds, 
Dog breeds with a ridge on their back

The term 'ridgeback' is most commonly associated with the Rhodesian ridgeback. However, this breed is not alone in bearing this curious dorsal ridge.Another ridgebacked dog is the Thai ridgeback. Two more Asian ridgebacked dogs are the Phu Quoc dog from Vietnam and the Cambodian Razorback Dog. A fifth, less documented breed, is the Mha Kon Klab from Thailand.

Some researchers believe that it were the Phu Quoc dogs or their ancestors which were transported from India and Thailand to the southern African mainland and formed the basis for a ridgebacked breed on the African continent. Ancient Indian dogs may have accompanied the earliest Indian trade vessels and interbred with the early Khoi dogs on the African mainland.


Other cynologists believe that the Ridgeback is indigenous to Africa but was taken to Vietnam, either by the Arabs trading with China, or by the Portugese and Dutch, trading in ivory and gold between Africa and the East from the 15th to the 18th century.

In that case the Khoi dog may have transmitted the ridge feature, not only to the Rhodesian ridgeback, but also to the Asian ridgebacked dogs, even if indirectly. The fact the some Khoi dogs inhabited sparsely populated areas where contact with other dog groups was limited, explains why this spontaneous genetic mutation became fixed in this breed.

While we may conclude that African ridged dogs are indigenous to Africa, it does seem that the Phu Quoc dog and Rhodesian Ridgeback originate from the same basic pariah stock common to southern Asia and Africa.

The Rodhesion ridgeback is the only of the five ridgebacked dogs that was granted championship status, in 1954.

FCI Standards for Thai Ridgeback:

GENERAL APPEARANCE

Medium-sized dog with short hair forming a ridge along the back. The body is slightly longer than its height at withers. Muscles are well developed, and its anatomical structure is suitable for activities.

IMPORTANT PROPORTIONS

Length of body : Height at the withers = 11 : 1O
Depth of chest : Height at the withers = 1 : 2

BEHAVIOUR / TEMPERAMENT

Tough and active with excellent jumping ability. A loyal family dog.

HEAD

CRANIAL REGION
Skull : The skull is flat between the ears but slightly rounded when seen from the side.
Forehead : Wrinkles when the dog is attentive.
Stop : Clearly defined, but moderateFACIAL REGION :
Nose : Black. In blue dogs, the nose is bluish.
Nasal bridge : Straight and long.
Muzzle : Wedge-shaped, slightly shorter than skull.
Lips : Tight with good pigmentation.
Mouth : Black marking on the tongue is preferable.
Jaws : Upper and lower jaws are strong.
Teeth : White and strong with scissors bite.
Eyes : Medium size and almond shaped. The eye colour is dark brown. In blues, amber-coloured eyes are permitted.
Ears : Set on sides of the skull. Medium sized, triangular, inclining forward and firmly pricked. Not cropped.

NECK

Medium length, strong, muscular, slightly arched and holding head high.

BODY

Back : Strong and level.
Loin : Strong and broad.
Croup : Moderately sloping.
Chest : Deep enough to reach the elbows. The ribs are well sprung, but not barrel-shaped.
Lower line : The belly is well tucked up.

TAIL

Thick at base with gradual tapering toward the tip. The tip can reach hock joints. Carried vertically and slightly curved.

LIMBS

FOREQUARTERS :
Shoulder : Well laid back.
Forearm : Straight.
Pastern : Straight when seen from the front and very slightly sloping when seen from the side.
Feet : Oval
Nails : Black but can be lighter depending on coat colour.

HINDQUARTERS : 
Thighs : Well developed with well bent stifles.
Hocks : Strong and well let down.
Rear Pastern : Straight and parallel when seen from the rear.
Feet : Oval
FEET : Medium sized, short, oval, pointing straight foreward with strong pads and well knuckled up.

GAIT

Reachy stride with no pitching nor rolling of the body. Parallel tracking at normal speed. When viewed from the front, the forelegs move up and down in straight lines so that the shoulder, elbow and pastern joints are approximately in line with each other. When viewed from the rear, the stifle and hip joints are approximately in line. Movement in a straight line forward without throwing the feet in or out; thus enabling the stride to be long and drive powerful. The overall appearance of the moving dog is one of smooth flowing and well balanced rhythm.

SKIN

Soft, fine and tight. Throat : no dewlap.

COAT

HAIR : Short and smooth. The ridge on the top region is formed by the hair growing in the opposite direction to the rest of the coat. It should be clearly defined from other parts of the back. There are various shapes and lengths of ridge, but must be symmetrical on either side of the backbone and within the width of the back. Crowns or whirls at the head of the ridge are acceptable.

COLOUR : Solid colour : red, black, blue and very light fawn (isabella). Black mask is preferable in reds.

SIZE

Ideal height at the withers : Dogs 22-24 inches (56-61 cm) Bitches 20-22 inches (51-56 cm).
There is a tolerance of plus or minus one inch (2.5 cm).

100 Canadian Sled Dogs Slaughtered

The “execution-style” mass cull of 100 sled dogs owned by Whistler-based Outdoor Adventures has sparked an SPCA investigation into allegations of animal cruelty, outrage from animal welfare groups and suspension by Tourism Whistler of reservations for dog sledding excursions by the company.

The cull came to light because of a successful WorkSafeBC claim for post-traumatic stress by the employee who killed the dogs over two days last April.

The worker said he suffered panic attacks and nightmares because of the grisly scenes that unfolded as he carried out the company’s orders to kill 100 of its 300 dogs because of a slow winter season.

Many were killed in mass shootings, carried out in front of each other, that caused the dogs to panic and attack him.

“By the end he was covered in blood,” according to the review board’s Jan. 25 decision that found he did suffer post-traumatic stress. “When he finished he cleared up the mess, filled in the mass grave and tried to bury the memories as deeply as he could.”

Five days after the final culling, he sought treatment from a clinical counsellor who indicated he was suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder.

The animal cruelty investigation came to light after WorkSafeBC’s Jan. 25 decision was made public.

The full report, by review officer Allan Wotherspoon, obtained by The Vancouver Sun, stated the worker’s “employer did not protest acceptance of the claim” nor did they provide any evidence to counter the worker’s declaration “thus I accept the worker’s account of what occurred with reservation.”

Wotherspon found the “‘mass cull’ was unique in its size, not only in respect of the workers’ experience but in all of Canada.”

Outdoors Adventures, which also offers snowmobiling, snowshoeing and horseback excursions in the Whistler area, did not return repeated phone calls from The Sun.

However, a statement by Outdoor Adventures spokesman Graham Aldcroft said there are now no firearms on site and any time a sled dog is euthanized in the future, it will be done in a vet’s office.

“While we were aware of the relocation and euthanization of dogs at “Howling Dog Tours,” we were completely unaware of the details of the incident until reading the WCB document Sunday,” he stated in the release.

Outdoor Adventures had a financial stake in ‘Howling Dogs’ which is owned by 29-year-old Joey Houssian, whom Piqué Magazine identifies as the son of Intrawest scion Joe Houssian. He is also listed as a director with Outdoor Adventures, which was incorporated in 1997.

Tourism Whistler, the official marketing and sales body for the resort, has suspended reservations for dog sledding activities with the company.

It is also offering money back to anyone who has already booked a dog sled tour with the company, said senior manager of communications Breton Murphy.

He said it’s too early to say whether the dog-cruelty allegations will hurt tourism generally to Whistler.

Marcie Moriarty, head of the BC SPCA cruelty investigations division, said the employee, who was the general manager at the time with Outdoor Adventures in Whistler, could have simply said no when his employer ordered him to kill the dogs.

The man said in a written declaration to the WorkSafeBC review that he had “developed a strong emotional bond of mutual love and trust with” the dogs before carrying out the “execution-style” mass cull over two days.

“I’ve no doubt he has suffered post traumatic stress but there’s a thing called choice,” said Moriarty. “I absolutely would not have done this and he could have said no. This is a Criminal Code offence … I don’t feel sorry for this guy for one minute.”

Moriarty said the man chose to shoot and kill the dogs on April 21 and April 23 inhumanely.

“The way this employee describes it — it’s a massacre absolutely — a criminal code offence. These dogs were killed in front of the other dogs that were all tethered up on the compound [where the dogs are kept for Outdoor Adventures].”

The BC SPCA animal cruelty investigators plan to execute a search warrant to try to obtain further information about the culling.

Murphy said that after he heard details of the allegations against the dog sled company, “to call it tragic is an understatement.”

“We’ve had a number of visitors contacting us and saying they’re concerned about this operator … We’ve talked to the operator and they understand what we’re doing.

“It makes sense to us to have a suspension on the sales [of dog sledding] through our channels. We’re trying to be appropriate and show due diligence until the allegations have been investigated … We have to watch and wait.”

Murphy said Tourism Whistler has been helping market the dog sled tours for the past six years and will continue to market Outdoor Adventures’ other activities except dog sledding.

He said visitors can still take dog sleds with two other companies — Canadian Snowmobile and Blackcomb Snowmobile.

The WorkSafeBC report states the employee, who had known a lot of the dogs and even named many of them, lived with them and cared for them seven days a week, Part of his duties including occasionally euthanizing animals, who were old, ill, injured or where there were unwanted puppies.

“All prior culls were done with the support and approval of a veterinarian,” the man stated in a written declaration to the review.

“A veterinarian was contacted, but refused to euthanize healthy animals. Attempts were made to adopt out the dogs with only limited success.”

The report did not state by what means the company or the worker tried to find alternative homes for the sled dogs.

But over a two-day period in late April, 2010 he agreed to carry out the orders from his employer to euthanize some of them because part of his job duties “included herd control.” But what made it difficult for him this time was the large number of animals involved.

“In the past, his practice when euthanizing a dog was to take it for a walk in the woods and give them a nice meat meal to distract them. That would make for a calm environment and kept the dogs away from the general population so as not to disrupt them. He would use a gun to euthanize the dogs,” the report states.

However, because of the large number of dogs he said he was forced to euthanize the dogs in full view of the other dogs and by about the 15th dog it appeared to him “the dogs were experiencing anxiety and stress from observing the euthanasia of other members of the pack and were panicking.”

His family physician also indicated the worker, who resides at the same location as the dogs with his family, complained of “panic attacks, nightmares, sleep disturbances, anger, irritability and depressed mood since culling approximately 100 dogs.” In addition to the post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, he exhibited “dissociative symptoms.”

Moriarty said from what she’s read so far in the report “many people will be shocked” not only about the culling but how sled dogs are treated in general.

“There is a problem with the sled dog industry in general. People see these 20 sled dogs, an idyllic setting with snow in the background and think how great. But what they don’t see is the 200 dogs tethered and sleeping out back, chained to a barrel.”

She said from reading the report, it appears the request was made to kill the dogs because of a downturn in the business after the Olympics on the compound of Outdoor Adventures.

“What do they do when they don’t have the money to feed them all? When the dogs aren’t needed. The order to simply put them down is not acceptable.”

She said the SPCA plans to uncover the mass grave to examine the dogs’ remains but can’t do that immediately because the ground is frozen under several feet of snow.

Moriarty said she’s “glad a light is finally being shed on this industry. I just shudder whenever I see the ads for sled dog tours because I know how the majority of dogs are living. There are a few good operations but on a smaller scale.”

Vancouver Humane Society spokesman Peter Fricker said this isn’t the first time sled dogs have been hurt or killed by sled dog companies in Canada. He said the SPCA in Tumbler Ridge seized 34 badly neglected sled dogs in 2009.

“Our experience in every case where people use animals to make money and when there are financial difficulties the animals’ lives are put at risk.”

Fricker said the time has come for an outright ban on sled dog companies.

The NDP released a press release calling for the B.C. Liberals to begin funding animal protection work done by the BC SPCA, the only provincial body with specific authority to investigate animal cruelty complaints. The government provides zero dollars to animal protection.

David Greer, communications director with the Ministry of Citizens’ Services and Agriculture, said in an email to The Sun late Monday that the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act was amended in 2008 to stiffen potential penalties for those convicted of causing distress to an animal.

“The courts are now able to impose a lifetime ban on owning or possessing animals, up to six months in jail, and a fine of up to $5,000 for a first offence and $10,000 for any repeat offences.

“The amendments have also strengthened the authority of agents to seize evidence of an offence and take animals into custody.